<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AdenaDeMonte:blogs</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/Home/</link><description>Home</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>RedHerring</copyright><managingEditor>managing_editor</managingEditor><webMaster>webmaster</webMaster><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:41:20 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:41:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>BlogTronix RSS Generator v.1.0</generator><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>PolyFuels Nabs Key Fuel Cell Patents</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22262</link><description><![CDATA[The publicly-traded fuel cell company PolyFuel put out a release today announcing that it recently ...]]></description><content><![CDATA[<br>The publicly-traded fuel cell company PolyFuel put out a release today announcing that it recently received two broad patents for fundamental fuel cell technology.<br><br>The company claims the patents are key wins, solidifying their leadership in the fuel cell market.  “In any new field, there are ultimately a few, benchmark patents from which much future technology springs. We believe this is one of those situations,” said PolyFuel CEO Jim Balcom in a statement.<br><br>That’s because the technology they protect, or the “membranes,” dictate the size, cost, power, and efficiency of the hydrocarbon fuel cells, claims the company.<br><br>Fuel cells could one day compete against traditional lithium ion batteries in mobile devices. But there are plenty of challenges that make it difficult to predict the growth of the market.<br><br>PolyFuels develops methanol-based portable fuel cells, which potentially would extend laptop “battery” life up to eight hours of more (of course, with a fuel cell in place of a battery). But as CleanEdge partner Ron Pernick points out, if airplanes decide to ban methanol cartridges, much of the fuel cell storage industry would be devastated.<br><br>“Airplane restriction could throttle this industry,” he said.<br><br>Even without such restrictions, Mr. Pernick expects slow going for the fuel cell market, at least for the next decade.<br><br>Fuel cells were a $1.4 billion market in 2006, but most of that figure cites dollars poured into testing and project development. He expects the market to grow to $15.6 billion by 2016. To put that figure into perspective, he added, "that’s about the size the solar market is today."<br><br>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Clean Tech</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22262#0</comments><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:22:38 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22262</guid></item><item><title>$1500 Fuel Cells for Toy Cars</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22259</link><description><![CDATA[
Even though the U.S. Department of Energy announced today that it plans to invest up to $8.2 millio...
]]></description><content><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><img style="width: 451px; height: 336px;" src="http://www.adenademonte.com/image/car.jpg" alt="http://www.adenademonte.com/image/car.jpg" border="0"></p><p class="MsoNormal">Even though the <a href="http://www.doe.gov/news/4944.htm">U.S. Department of Energy announced today</a> that it plans to invest up to $8.2 million for hydrogen storage research, mass production of safe and affordable fuel cells for autos and energy storage is still a long way off.</p><p class="MsoNormal">The exception is the hydrogen fuel cell developed by Shanghai-based Horizon Fuel Cell Technologies. Their fuel cells won’t power full-sized vehicles any time soon, but their technology is on the market for sale in certain hobbyist R/C toy cars.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Today the company announced that it is selling a $1500 hydrogen fuel cell kit for the toy cars. The pricey kit comes with a hydrogen fuel cell power unit with a scaled down fuel storage system that can carry up to 30 liters of solid state hydrogen. The company, of course, claims the product is safe.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Horizon Fuel Cell Technologies’ hydrogen fuel-cell powered H-racer toy car received quite a bit of attention when it was put on the market last year. It was named one of the <a href="http://www.time.com/time/2006/techguide/bestinventions/">Best Inventions of 2006</a> by Time Magazine and it won<a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/biz2/0703/gallery.bottom_line_design.biz2/5.html">Business 2.0’s 2007 Bottom Line Design Award</a>.</p><p class="MsoNormal">The $150 H-racer only runs for a few minutes on its fuel cell power. But the $1500 kit’s fuel cell provides about an hour of play, according to a company spokesperson. Also, unlike the cheaper H-racer, the R/C cars with the “H-cell” can be controlled with a remote control.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Is this a sign of the future? Horizon Fuel Cell Technologies is also developing fuel cells for real-size applications in portable power and transportation. But larger applications come with all the safety and cost problems that fuel cell proponents have been facing for years.</p>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Clean Tech</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22259#0</comments><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:15:06 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22259</guid></item><item><title>Video: Plug-In Hybrids</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22251</link><description><![CDATA[Read more at ]]></description><content><![CDATA[<embed src="http://admin.brightcove.com/destination/player/player.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="allowFullScreen=true&amp;initVideoId=756022142&amp;servicesURL=http://www.brightcove.com&amp;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://www.brightcove.com&amp;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&amp;autoStart=false" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="bcPlayer" width="486" height="412" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swliveconnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"><div>Read more at <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=21955&amp;hed=Plug-In+Hybrid+Demo'd+at+AMD+Event+" style="cursor:hand">http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=21955&amp;hed=Plug-In+Hybrid+Demo'd+at+AMD+Event+</a></div>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Clean Tech</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22251#0</comments><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:47:59 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22251</guid></item><item><title>Color Changing Military Camouflage</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22250</link><description><![CDATA[Electricity-conducting wires are typically made of metals like copper or silver. But researchers at...
]]></description><content><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Electricity-conducting wires are typically made of metals like copper or silver. But researchers at the University of Texas at Austin are working on making such wires out of plastic. Plastic wires are cheap, more flexible than metal, and in some cases even disposable.</p><p class="MsoNormal">The plastic wires could one day be used in products such as military camouflage that changes colors, flexible displays, and medical sensors, claims an article in the April 7 issue of the Journal of Materials Chemistry.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>The inexpensive plastic wires can’t replace their metal counterparts, at least for the time being. But the low price and versatility of the plastic wiring could “lead to a variety of new consumer products in the upcoming years,” said Dr. Loo in a<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Lucida Grande; font-size: 17.3333px;"> </span><a href="http://www.engr.utexas.edu/news/articles/200704091190/index.cfm">press release</a>.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Hardware</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22250#0</comments><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:56:46 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22250</guid></item><item><title>iPod Craving Sugar?</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22218</link><description><![CDATA[Sugar CravingIs your iPod running out juice? For a quick charge, why not plug it into a can of soda...]]></description><content><![CDATA[Is your iPod running out of juice? For a quick charge, why not plug it into a can of soda pop?<br><br>While that’s not possible today, in a few years, sugar-powered batteries could replace energy-inefficient lithium ion batteries in everything from computers to mobile devices.<br><br>Researchers at St. Louis University, led by Dr. Shelley Minteer, have developed a fuel cell battery that runs on sugar. The research is based on the concept that all living organisms turn sugar into energy.<br><br>The batteries supposedly contain enzymes that convert sugars into electricity. They have the potential to operate three to four times longer on a single charge compared to conventional lithium ion batteries, according to United Press International.<br><br>Successful tests were carried out using a range of fuel sources including tree sap and soda pop, though it seems simple table sugar worked the best.<br><br>Jonathan M. Gitlin over at <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070326-sugar-powered-fuel-cells-are-totally-sweet.html%20">Ars Technica</a> says the work was funded by the U.S. Department of Defense. “A sugar-powered fuel cell could be used to charge the multitude of electronic gadgets U.S. soldiers take into the battlefield, from night sights to radios,” he writes. “But the technology obviously has even greater potential in the wider consumer electronics market.”<br><br> <br><br><br>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Clean Tech</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22218#0</comments><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:19:14 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22218</guid></item><item><title>Inrix Predicts Drive Time on Mobile Phones</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22216</link><description><![CDATA[When was the last time you were sitting in bumper-to-bumper traffic, eyeing the next exit a mile or...]]></description><content><![CDATA[When was the last time you were sitting in bumper-to-bumper traffic, eyeing the next exit a mile or so up the road, and wondering if a detour off the highway may actually get you to your destination faster?<br><br>Predictive traffic company Inrix (<a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=17027&amp;hed=RH+100+N.A.+%e2%80%93+Inrix" style="">a Red Herring 100 N.A. 2006 winner</a>) wants to help you figure out the best route using your mobile phone.<br><br>Inrix, known for feeding its real-time and predictive traffic information to online and TV newscasters, on Tuesday announced the release of predictive traffic software for Windows Mobile devices in 60 U.S. metropolitan markets.<br><br>Still, there’s tough competition in the predictive traffic market. Mapmaker Navteq announced in July that it will license technology from Inrix’s rival Landsonar. But mapmaker Tele Atlas announced earlier a deal to use Inrix’s technology (see <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=17543&amp;hed=Navteq+Takes+the+License+Route">Navteq</a> <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=17543&amp;hed=Navteq+Takes+the+License+Route">Takes the License Route</a><a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=16783&amp;hed=Inrix+Inks+Tele+Atlas+Deal">;</a> <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=16783&amp;hed=Inrix+Inks+Tele+Atlas+Deal">Inrix Inks Tele Altas Deal)</a>.<br><br>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Mobile</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22216#0</comments><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:45:51 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22216</guid></item><item><title>Qualcomm and Samsung Invest $8M in Shanghai’s AMEC</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22163</link><description><![CDATA[Qualcomm and Samsung invested $8 million in Shanghai-based chip equipment maker Advanced Micro-Fabr...]]></description><content><![CDATA[Qualcomm and Samsung invested $8 million in Shanghai-based chip equipment maker <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amec-inc.com">Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment</a> (AMEC) on Wednesday, closing <a target="_blank" href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=19067&amp;hed=China%C2%B9s+AMEC+Raises+$35M&amp;sector=Industries&amp;subsector=Computing">last October’s $35 million Series B investment</a> led by Walden International, Lightspeed Venture Partners, and Interwest Partners.<br><br>The investment is part of Qualcomm’s commitment it made in 2003 to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.qualcomm.com/press/releases/2003/press1221.htm">invest up to $100 million</a> in early to mid stage Chinese companies.<br><br>AMEC is developing manufacturing technologies and equipment for 65-nanometer and 45-nanometer chips, the most advanced processes currently available or under development by its competitors. Smaller chips increase performance and use less energy by preventing power leakage.<br><br>Some chips, such as Intel’s latest microprocessors, are manufactured using a 65-nm process. But most chipmakers are still using a 90-nm process technology.<br><br><br>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Hardware</category><category>Venture Capitalist</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22163#0</comments><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:07:31 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22163</guid></item><item><title>Samsung Ships Hybrid Hard Drive</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21563</link><description><![CDATA[Notebook PC makers hesitant to adopt flash/hard disc drive.]]></description><content><![CDATA[<p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">By Adena DeMonte</b></p><p>Samsung Electronics on Wednesday began shipping a hybrid hard drive that the company claims will speed up boot times and eat up 70-90 percent less power than traditional hard drive units. But some analysts said computer makers were hesitant to adopt the new technology until the Korean company could prove it was reliable.</p><p>Samsung’s hybrid hard drive combines a small flash memory chip with a traditional rotating disc drive. Incoming data is recorded on the chip and transferred to the disc drive only when the flash memory is full. That means the traditional disc spins less frequently and uses less power.</p><p>Computers will require a hybrid hard drive to run Microsoft’s Windows Vista Premium laptops, but uptake will remain modest in the short term. iSuppli analyst Krishna Chander expects hybrid drives to account for 1 to 2 percent of hard drive sales in 2006, growing to about 3 percent in 2007. Growth is seen to take off in 2008, when hybrids will account for 15 to 20 percent of the notebook sales, he said. </p><p>“There is a challenge to prove the reliability of this total drive that has both flash and hard drives integrated into one,” said Mr. Chander.</p><p>Seagate Electronics, leader in the hard drive market, is hot on Samsung tail and expects to roll out a similar offering in the near future. Chip giant Intel is also developing similar technology known as Robson that could slow Samsung’s push for market share. But Mr. Chander thinks there’s place for both technologies, noting that hybrid hard drives and Robson will likely see equal growth in the coming years.</p><p>Samsung’s hybrid launch comes as the notebook hard drive market is exploding. iSuppli said Wednesday that notebook hard drive shipments were set to hit $14.9 billion in 2010, up from $9.2 billion in 2006. Compare those figures to the desktop hard drive market, which took in $11.6 billion in 2006 and is expected to lose steam, shrinking to $11.2 billion in 2010. </p><p>Still, Samsung faces tough competition to maintain and grow market share in the crowded hard drive market. According to the iSuppli report, Samsung sold only 10 percent of the hard drives shipped in 2006, ranking fourth behind leaders Seagate Technology at 33 percent, Western Digital at 20 percent, and <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Hitachi</st1:place></st1:city> at 16 percent.</p><st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Hitachi</st1:place></st1:city>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Computers</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21563#0</comments><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21563</guid></item><item><title>Gore and Schwarzenegger: Eco-Hypocrites?</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22142</link><description><![CDATA[In response to accusations of hypocrisy regarding his policies on the environment, California Gover...]]></description><content><![CDATA[In response to accusations of hypocrisy regarding his policies on the environment, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-jets28feb28,0,2448915.story?coll=la-home-headlines">said Wednesday</a> he would buy carbon offsets to make up for the pollution caused by his frequent trips by private jet.<br><br>He’s not the first politician to run into such trouble this week. Al Gore faced similar criticism Monday when the Tennessee Center for Policy Research (TCPR) said that Gore, who won an Oscar last weekend for his documentary on global warming “An Inconvenient Truth,” actually deserves a “gold statue for hypocrisy.”<br><br>Gore’s posh Nashville mansion consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service (NES). [Find out more in the release “<a target="_blank" href="http://www.tennesseepolicy.org/main/article.php?article_id=367">Al Gore’s Personal Energy Use Is His Own ‘Inconvenient Truth.’</a>”]<br><br>Gore’s spokesperson told the L.A. Times that he invests in renewable energy to make up for the difference, but the former Vice President could take a clue from Schwarzenegger for his clever media play with the carbon offset program.<br><br>Schwarzenegger is reportedly joining with jet-leasing company NetJets to start a carbon offset program for jet customers. According to the Times, “carbon offsets are bought from organizations that plant trees and support renewable energy enterprises… to offset greenhouse gases produced by the buyers.”<br><br>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Clean Tech</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22142#0</comments><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:43:31 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22142</guid></item><item><title>SiPix Debuts Mobile Phone Keypad Display</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22138</link><description><![CDATA[When I first saw SiPix Imaging’s announcement about their development of the “world’s first e-paper...]]></description><content><![CDATA[SiPix Imaging<font color="#474747"> said it has developed a keypad for mobile phones that can act as a display, using what's known as electronic paper.<br><br></font><div style="text-align: center;"><img alt="/ClientFiles/e87d1f7d-86d8-440c-aaaa-d88401347690/sipix.gif" src="/ClientFiles/e87d1f7d-86d8-440c-aaaa-d88401347690/sipix.gif" border="0" height="274" width="300"></div><br>So called e-paper flexible displays that resemble an electronic form of paper<br>could one day replace everything from newspapers to mobile phone displays. As the name suggests, such displays are flat, flexible, and in some cases even rollable. But it's still unclear how SiPix's latest product will take advantage of the screen's flexibility.<br><br>One thing is for sure, Fremont, California-based SiPix must be onto something. SiPix  is backed by over $100 million in funding from Goldman Sachs, ING Barings, Worldview, BASF, Foxconn, Toppan Forms, PTI Ventures, CMC, New Margin Ventures, and Yasuda Ventures.<br><br>The display is designed to replace traditional mobile keypads. Co-developed with keypad manufacturer Silitech, the e-paper technology  replaces the keypad on a mobile phone with a second display screen. This means that the number keys on a mobile phone are now able to magically change into letters, symbols, or personalized icons.<br><br>In January, SiPix's partner Polymer Vision inked a deal with U.K.-based Innos to manufacture flexible displays (see <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=20944&amp;hed=Flexible+Display+Rivals+Racing+to+Market">Flexible Display Rivals Racing to Market)</a>.<br><br><br><br>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Gadgets</category><category>Hardware</category><category>Mobile</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22138#0</comments><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:22:30 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/blogs/22138</guid></item><item><title>Coal Loses in TXU Acquisition</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21454</link><description><![CDATA[Texas utility company gets acquired in the heat of coal controversy.]]></description><content><![CDATA[<p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">By Adena DeMonte</b></p><p>TXU, the Dallas-based utility company that has riled up environmentalists and others by proposing to build 11 new coal plants, announced Monday that it will be purchased by a group of private equity firms for $45 billion.</p><p>The purchase was led by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co., Texas Pacific Group, and Goldman Sachs &amp; Co. GS Capital Partners, Lehman Brothers, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley intend to be equity investors at closing. </p><p>Some environmentalists are hailing this buyout as a possible win because it comes with an announcement that the company has given up plans to build eight of the 11 proposed coal-fired plants. The scale-back represents a 75 percent reduction in new coal capacity, or 56 million tons of annual carbon emissions, according to a TXU statement on the sale.</p><p>“Today marks the beginning of the end of big coal’s dominance over America’s energy future,” said Michael Brune, executive director of the Rainforest Action Network (RAN) in a statement. </p><p>Executive Editor of GreenBiz Joel Makower said that the deal is a major development because the environment became a “top line negotiating point for utility acquisition.”</p><p>“I think it puts everybody on notice that carbon is an investment risk and that utility growth going forward needs to look beyond fossil fuels,” said Mr. Makower. </p><p>The proposed TXU coal plants, along with six other proposed plants that <st1:state w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Texas</st1:place></st1:state> governor Rick Perry has asked to fast track, have heated up controversy about coal as an energy source. Coal is the dirtiest fossil fuel, but it has become a key player in energy production as countries strive for energy independence.</p><st1:state w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Texas</st1:place></st1:state><p>Global coal consumption is expected to nearly double from 5.4 billion short tons in 2003 to 10.6 billion short tons in 2030, according to the U.S. Department of Energy’s Environmental Information Association (EIA) International Energy Outlook for 2006. </p><p>In the U.S., coal supplies about 52 percent of electricity. It also generates 84 percent of the electricity emissions, according to the EIA. Coal emits twice as much carbon dioxide as natural gas, the cleanest fossil fuel, according to environmental nonprofit Environmental Defense.</p><p>“Up until now the coal industry believed that through their sheer marketplace power they could keep building coal plants forever,” said Mr. Makower. “I think this is a wake up call.”</p>The announcement also comes with details of TXU’s plans to invest $400 million in demand-side management over the next five years.]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Cleantech</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21454#0</comments><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21454</guid></item><item><title>AMD, Intel, Others Launch Green Grid</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21453</link><description><![CDATA[Tech companies launch energy efficiency initiative, but it’s all about “green” cash.]]></description><content><![CDATA[<p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">By Adena DeMonte</b></p><p>Here’s a list of companies you don’t often see holding hands: Intel, Advanced Micro Devices, Dell, HP, IBM, Microsoft, AMC, SprayCool, Rackable Systems, VMware, and Sun Microsystems.</p><p>But in the first joint effort of its kind, a consortium of IT companies a launched an initiative called the “The Green Grid” that aims to develop standards, measurement methods, processes and technologies to improve the energy efficiency of high technology products. </p><p>Not everyone, however, believes the Green Grid is an environmental initiative. “Green is the color du jour,” said Joel Makower, executive editor of GreenBiz. “Everything that’s more efficient these days is green. At the end of the day I don’t think we’re going to be saving energy here. We’re just going to be using it much more efficiently to serve even more bandwidth, but in the process use much more energy.” </p><p>Energy usage is a growing concern as chips get more powerful, and power hungry, and server farms continue to grow in size. Half of the world’s data centers will run out of power by the end of 2008, according to a Gartner report released in November. Server farms sucked up 1.2 percent of the total electricity consumption in 2005, according to a recent survey by Dr. Jonathan Koomey commissioned by AMD (see <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=21318&amp;hed=Study+Exposes+Server+Energy+Costs">Study Exposes Server Energy Costs).</a></p><a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=21318&amp;hed=Study+Exposes+Server+Energy+Costs">Study Exposes Server Energy Costs).</a><p>“If I can make such a strategic part of my business more efficient, it’s going to turn into dollars,” said Mark Monroe, director of sustainable computing with Sun Microsystems. “If I don’t, because of the rising price of energy, it’s going to be a real detriment to my business. Green is green, conservation and efficiency equal profits in every case.”</p><p>Initiatives to measure power consumption of servers are popping up as concerns about global warming have hit the mainstream. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Energy are expected to release a complete report on server efficiency in June. Servers could soon be subject to federal energy usage limits, similar to those imposed on household appliances, said Mr. Koomey.</p><p>IC Insights analyst Brian Matas credits the chips industry for its environmental perspective. “Making sure they’re not contributing to environmental wastes or hazards that way is an issue that has been swept under the rug,” said Mr. Matas. “The semiconductor (industry) is at the forefront of keeping things clean and (they are) doing a lot to make sure they’re meeting the government standards.”</p><p>In addition to chips manufacturers, companies selling virtualization software such VMware and Microsoft are key players in reducing server power demands. Advanced cooling systems from companies such as SprayCool also make power reduction a key part of their business. </p>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Cleantech</category><category>Computers</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21453#0</comments><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21453</guid></item><item><title>Scientists Turns Heat into Electricity</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21333</link><description><![CDATA[Lab Report: Scientists at UC Berkeley successfully generated electricity from waste heat using organic molecules.]]></description><content><![CDATA[<p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">By Adena DeMonte</b></p><p>In the quest for efficient ways to directly convert heat into electricity, <st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype> of <st1:placename w:st="on">California</st1:placename> at <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Berkeley</st1:place></st1:city> researchers announced Thursday that they have generated electricity from heat using organic molecules and metal nanoparticles.</p><st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype><st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Berkeley</st1:place></st1:city><p>If the method of electricity creation using waste heat can scale up to mass production, the technology could open up significant business opportunities to developing new sources of energy.</p><p>“Clearly any time you turn a waste product into a valuable energy product, that’s a great business opportunity as well as something that syncs with all our climate and energy independence goals,” said Joel Makower, principal with Clean Edge.</p><p>Ninety-percent of the world’s power today is created turning heat into electricity. “If you can generate power from waste heat, this could reduce the amount of fuel we have to use today for power and it will free it up for other applications. It will also reduce carbon dioxide emissions,” said Pramod Reddy, a graduate student in UC Berkeley’s Applied Science and Technology Program and co-lead author of the paper.</p><p>The dominant method is burning fossil fuels to create high-temperature heat that is then turned into electricity. However, in this process, approximately two-thirds of the heat created is wasted because it is too cool to be turned into electricity. </p><p>“Generating one watt of power requires about three watts of heat input and involves duping into the environment the equivalent of about two watts of power in the form of heat,” said Arun Majumdar, UC Berkeley professor and principal investigator of the study, in a statement. “If even a fraction of the lost heat can be converted into electricity in a cost-effective manner, the impact it would have on energy can be enormous, amounting to massive savings of fuel and reductions in carbon dioxide emissions.”</p><p>Researchers have long been experimenting with ways to turn the wasted lower-temperature heat into electricity. Methods using inorganic materials have proven both expensive and inefficient. The new UC Berkeley study marks the first time organic molecules have been used for thermoelectric materials. The method creates electricity by joining two different metals at different temperatures.</p><p>“Since organic molecules have so much variety, we believe there is so much more we can do,” said Mr. Reddy.</p><p>Still, the technology is at the “science project stage,” said nanotechnology consultant Scott Mize, explaining that it will likely take a while to bring the technology to market. But that’s normal for the energy sector, he said. “A lot of the technology that we see today is information technology which tends to be developed very quickly, but when you’re talking about energy, it takes a lot longer to get that into the marketplace.”</p><p>While the timeline of getting the technology to market is an unknown, for UC Berkeley, the discovery is another notch in their energy innovation prowess. </p><p>“What’s important is that more and more companies are looking to UC Berkeley as a place where innovations happen and turn into market opportunities,” said Mr. Makower.</p><p>Earlier this month, UC Berkeley received a large portion of a $500 million grant from British Petroleum (BP) for its Energy Biosciences Institute, focusing on development of biofuels and other alternative fuel sources.</p>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Cleantech</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21333#0</comments><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21333</guid></item><item><title>Study Exposes Server Energy Costs</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21318</link><description><![CDATA[Study shows server farms sucked up 1.2 percent of total U.S. electricity consumption in 2005.]]></description><content><![CDATA[<p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">By Adena DeMonte</b></p><p>Total power used by servers, cooling and auxiliary infrastructure amounted to 1.2 percent of the total U.S. electricity consumption in 2005, according to a Lawrence Berkeley Lab study released Thursday. </p><p>Commissioned by chip manufacturer AMD to promote its dual-core Opteron processors, the study was led by Lawrence Berkeley Lab staff scientist and Stanford University Consulting Professor Jonathan Koomey. </p><p>It set out to quantify the energy costs associated with servers—a feat that has proven difficult over the years due to a lack of measurement tools for the energy usage of servers and associated infostructure. </p><p>The last study on the subject was conducted in 2002 by IDC.</p><p>The Lawrence Berkeley Lab study reported that the total electricity bill for sever operation and associated infrastructure in 2005 is estimated to be $2.7 billion in the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region> and $7.3 billion globally.</p><st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region><p>Mr. Koomey said that the most surprising finding from the survey was that aggregate electricity use for servers doubled from 2000 to 2005, both in the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">U.S.</st1:country-region></st1:place> and worldwide. </p><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">U.S.</st1:country-region></st1:place><p>He hopes the findings of the study will encourage the government to put out Energy Star specifications for energy-efficient servers. </p><p>The Environmental Production Agency (EPA) and the U.S Energy Department along with Lawrence Berkeley Lab are preparing a complete report for congress that is due in June 2007. </p><p>Government specification of energy efficient servers could fuel industry growth for virtualization technology, efficient server redesign, and energy-efficient cooling technology, said John Fruehe, worldwide business development manager for AMD Opteron. </p><p>While saving the environment might be the spark to the energy efficient trend, in the end saving energy is good business for AMD.</p><p>“We need to be much more responsible about the products that we’re designing to make sure we can allow companies to grow,” said Mr. Fruehe. “The last thing you want to do is put them in a situation where they can no longer afford to grow their business because you’ve artificially limited them with the amount of power they consume.”</p>]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Computers</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21318#0</comments><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21318</guid></item><item><title>Cree Builds LED City in Raleigh</title><link>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21251</link><description><![CDATA[North Carolina city partners with Cree to bring LED lighting to city streets and garages.]]></description><content><![CDATA[<p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">By <a href="mailto:ADeMonte@RedHerring.com">Adena DeMonte</a></b></p><p>In a citywide initiative to reduce costly energy consumption, <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Raleigh</st1:city>, <st1:state w:st="on">North Carolina</st1:state></st1:place> officials announced a deal Monday with local LED-lighting company Cree.</p><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Raleigh</st1:city>, <st1:state w:st="on">North Carolina</st1:state></st1:place><p><st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Raleigh</st1:place></st1:city> considers itself a “living laboratory” for Cree’s light-emitting diode lighting. While LED lighting is not new to city streets in the <st1:country-region w:st="on">United States</st1:country-region>, Cree’s goal with its “<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placename w:st="on">LED</st1:placename><st1:placetype w:st="on">City</st1:placetype></st1:place>” initiative is to show city officials that for certain lighting needs, such as parking garage lighting, the technology is ready today for implementation and energy savings.</p><p>“Nobody [else] has stepped forward with this direct partnership to move this technology to a mass market,” said Raleigh Assistant City Manager Daniel Howe.</p><p>Cree boasts that in parking garages alone, the LED lighting will be 40 percent more energy efficient than conventional lights. Still, installation of the lighting is expensive up front, and it remains to be seen whether the company will get a boost from sales outside of <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Raleigh</st1:place></st1:city>. </p><st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Raleigh</st1:place></st1:city><p>If the lighting technology takes off, though, Cree is certain to see fierce competition from big names in lighting such as Philips, in addition to dozens of startups that want to get in on the game.</p><p>LEDs, light semiconductors traditionally used to light liquid crystal displays (LCDs), are set to compete with fluorescent lighting and other lighting alternatives for outdoor and indoor lighting. That is, if LEDs can produce bright enough white light and if the bulbs can come down in cost enough to financially benefit consumers. That, however, might be light years away.</p><p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Proving the Cost Savings</b></p><p>Cree CEO Chuck Swoboda knows that sales success depends upon proving the significant long-term savings of LEDs. </p><p>“We already know we can build LEDs from an efficiency standpoint,” said Mr. Swoboda. “The real question is, where does the economics come in? Great technology without an economic benefit doesn’t drive anyone to convert.”</p><p>For now, cost savings can be found when LED bulbs replace conventional metal halide lighting in locations where the lights are on 24 hours a day, seven days a week. In addition to energy savings, the reduction in maintenance can also cut costs because LEDs can last about 10 years.</p><p>In exchange for being Cree’s guinea pig, the city of <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Raleigh</st1:city></st1:place> has received discounts on installation. The city paid only 40 percent of the installation costs for the first parking garage light test. </p><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Raleigh</st1:city></st1:place><p>There are plans to replace 33,000 streetlights, fixed lighting on city vehicles such as fire trucks and police cars, and flashlights for firefighters with LED lights.</p><p>Indoor office LED lighting has yet to prove efficient enough to merit replacement of conventional lighting, but <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Raleigh</st1:city></st1:place>’s Mr. Howe remains optimistic. </p><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Raleigh</st1:city></st1:place><p>“We’re hoping the technology will move forward on office lighting,” said Mr. Howe. “We’re not going to go with anything that doesn’t prove itself. It wouldn’t be prudent to buy something that’s LED if it’s going to cost citizens more money.”</p><p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Banning the Bulb</b></p><p>The announcement comes less than a month after California assemblyman Lloyd Levine proposed a California-wide ban on conventional incandescent lighting by 2012 (see <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=21087&amp;hed=Could+California+Ban+the+Bulb%3f">Could California Ban the Bulb?</a>). The proposed ban reflects <st1:state w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">California</st1:place></st1:state>’s energy-aware political climate in which environmental laws are often tested out before they appear elsewhere in the country.</p><st1:state w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">California</st1:place></st1:state><p>Nearly 3,000 miles removed from <st1:state w:st="on">California</st1:state>’s politics, Mr. Howe said city officials are aware through the grapevine of what <st1:state w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">California</st1:place></st1:state> is doing. In response to the conventional-lighting ban proposal, Mr. Howe said the ban will be unnecessary when LED technology takes off. </p><st1:state w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">California</st1:place></st1:state>“You won’t have to ban incandescent bulbs [because] they will disappear from the scene if LEDs meet expectations for what the market has out there,” he said.]]></content><author>Adena DeMonte</author><category>Cleantech</category><comments>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21251#0</comments><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.redherring.com/Home/21251</guid></item></channel></rss>