Facebook Defers to U.K. Advertisers
by
Leah Messinger
on
09 August 2007, 18:56
Categories:
Internet
Topics:
vodafone
,
FaceBook
,
IAB
,
British National Party
,
First Direct
,
Khalil Ibrahimi
,
Internet Advertising Sales House
,
Internet Advertising Bureau
,
Rupert Staines
,
Adviva
Facebook
this week agreed to give U.K.
advertisers more control over where their ads appear on the social network, but
it was not immediately clear whether several large companies would reconsider
their decision to pull their ads from social network sites.
At least
six major U.K.-based advertisers, including Virgin Media and the British
automobile association, as well as the British government’s publicity arm, stopped
advertising on Facebook after banner ads for Vodafone and First Direct appeared
on a webpage belonging to right-wing, racist British National Party.
A Facebook
spokesperson said the company will allow U.K. advertisers to choose whether
they want their ads to appear alongside group pages on Facebook. The social
network also said it is exploring technology to provide more options to
advertisers.
The
announcement came not a moment too soon for Khalil Ibrahimi, founder of London-based
ad network Unanimis and the chairman of the Internet Advertising Sales House, a
committee of the UK’s Internet Advertising Bureau in charge of creating a
national code of conduct for U.K. advertisers. “It’s about bloody time,” Mr.
Ibrahimi said.
He said Facebook’s
move was a good start, but the uproar over the British ads appearing next to
offensive content on Facebook is a symptom of an ongoing disconnect between U.S.
publishers and U.K.
advertisers.
Nearly two
years ago, 15 major U.K.
ad houses signed on to the IASH code of conduct, which bars advertisers from
advertising on sites where discriminatory or violent content appears. But the
agencies have had trouble meshing that code of conduct with U.S.-based sites,
which tend to host more outrageous user-generated content than British sites,
according to Mr. Ibrahimi.
He said
that because British speech laws differ from American statutes, U.K. publishers
can be held legally responsible for offensive content on their sites. In turn,
he said, British advertisers are more likely to go after publishers for
defamation of brand equity when their ads run next to that content, Mr.
Ibrahimi said.
Rupert
Staines, a vice president at ad network Adviva, said via email that he is not impressed with
Facebook’s first steps. “In this specific case, Facebook should be more
detailed about the action they are taking and the tools they are developing to
ensure total protection as well as the rules by which the agency/advertiser has
to play,” he said.
Facebook’s
new steps will first take effect in the UK. The Facebook spokesperson said
the company is considering options for advertisers in the other countries where
the site operates.